-=|MisterY|=-'s Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172302399 | 4 months ago | Right. It's for the tourists staying at the bungalows, which all seem to be available for rent. |
| 172301498 | 4 months ago | Ah, no, sorry. That stretch of road was too long and I did not realize. Going down the valley, there are three distinct surfaces - compacted, two asphalt lines for wheels, and full asphalt. Unfortunately, I no longer remember where exactly they start/end. I've now adjusted this and the downstream stretch. But it is not all unpaved, as was tagged before. |
| 161343869 | 6 months ago | Vielleicht hat jemand versehentlich den Kletterbegriff verwendet, weil die Notiz besagt, dass es sich um einen „alternativen“ Einstieg zum Kamplsteig handelt. Ich stimme zu, dass die schwarz-weiße Markierung kein Kletter- oder Wanderwegzeichen ist. Am besten wäre es, den Punkt mit „FixMe“ zu markieren und nach einer Begehung von jemandem anpassen zu lassen.
|
| 161343869 | 6 months ago | Ok, ich verstehe, was hier passiert ist. Jemand anderes hat die Kletterroute bereits vorher eingetragen. Ich habe nur das Tag sport\:climbing hinzugefügt, damit sie auf Kletterkarten angezeigt wird. |
| 161343869 | 6 months ago | Stimmt. Es ist auch möglich das ich die falsche Linie geklickt habe.
|
| 161343869 | 6 months ago | Oh, es ist sicher eine Kletterroute. Meine Kollegen vom Alpenverein haben das schon gemacht. Da ist auch eine Markierung am Anfang. |
| 148160621 | 8 months ago | ah, yes, you're right. I've adjusted it to follow the light visible path.
|
| 148160621 | 8 months ago | Right. That part is hard to say from this perspective. But the path is clearly visible on the latest aerial imagery.
|
| 148160621 | 8 months ago | Hi! This one is based on the aerial imagery.
|
| 164641154 | 8 months ago | Hi David! Die Name ist mir unbekannt. :)
|
| 158678301 | 10 months ago | Here's the latest thread on the topic, with some history: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-the-current-climbing-wiki-correct/120225/ |
| 158678301 | 10 months ago | Hey! It is really a pleasure and honor to have your feedback.
|
| 158678301 | 10 months ago | >I am not sure if it makes sense to tag all faces. Of course not. Just those that have known climbing routes. Meaning somebody has climbed them, suggested a grade, and there is a topo available for other climbers. |
| 158678301 | 10 months ago | Oh, it would be nice if all faces were climbable and had topos available. :)
|
| 158678301 | 10 months ago | Hi! I'm adding the missing climbing tags to some items that are already on the map, or adding new crags and areas for those that are not. I'm adding the data from other public climbing sources. There are a lot of items in OSM that are missing the climbing tags, which were probably agreed-upon later.
|
| 159175476 | about 1 year ago | The same is with OpenAndroMaps and Mapy.cz. The few that don't show the areas (Organic Maps, osmapp), don't show sinkholes at all. |
| 159175476 | about 1 year ago | Correct, but that's a problem of a renderer, then. In OsmAnd, the sinkholes areas are rendered correctly and that makes a big difference when hiking in a pathless terrain. |
| 159175476 | about 1 year ago | Possibly, but that seems like a work-around for a non-existing problem. I don't see a good reason to avoid mapping a sinkhole as an area. |
| 159175476 | about 1 year ago | There is a significant difference in size of different sinkholes. Pol Monster, just a bit to the left, has a diameter of over a hundred meters. A node does not do it justice. |
| 158133947 | about 1 year ago | Hi! You have moved Am Spitz bus station way out of it's position. Please fix. |