Here I go again…. part 2.
I was pleased to see someone pick up on my first diary item. OSM weekly is hardly the New York Times, yet I know that the editors like posts which are constructively critical, and they did spot that I was hoping for something to happen which would let us all “do better”.
I decided to look in more detail at how the lack of detail was leaving validators with a lot of mapping to do. Evidence of this is seen here, where the mapper marking the tile as “completely mapped” is nowhere near being the main contributor of objects and the validator – DeBigC – has add or adjust 62% of the objects in the tile. This shows the last mapper to touch any object.
Note: I do accept that this is one tile, but it’s not unusual to find this all over the Fingal task.





Thanks to Open Mapping Hub& Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) for creating a space for me to join and get some knowledge. Also thanks to the host
Thanks to Mikko Tamura for giving a chance (in a suitable
platform ) to join with some advanced person.
YouthMappers🤍
YouthMappers at Eastern University, Bangladesh🆗
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT)🥰
Thanks to Mikko Tamura for giving a chance (in a suitable
platform ) to join with some advanced person.
YouthMappers 🤍
YouthMappers at Eastern University, Bangladesh 🆗
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) 🥰
Thanks to Mikko Tamura for giving a chance (in a suitable
platform ) to join with some wonderful person.
YouthMappers 🤍
YouthMappers at Eastern University, Bangladesh 🆗
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) 🥰
Thanks to Mikko Tamura for giving a chance (in a suitable
platform ) to join with some advanced person.
YouthMappers 🤍
YouthMappers at Eastern University, Bangladesh 🆗
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) 🥰
Thanks to Mikko Tamura for giving a chance (in a suitable
platform ) to join with some advanced person.
YouthMappers 🤍
YouthMappers at Eastern University, Bangladesh 🆗
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT) 🥰